Article | October 01, 2002Advocacy Audrey Holland Author Notes © 2002 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Article Information Regulatory, Legislative & Advocacy / Advocacy Article | October 01, 2002 Advocacy SIG 2 Perspectives on Neurophysiology and Neurogenic Speech and Language Disorders, October 2002, Vol. 12, 32. doi:10.1044/nnsld12.3.32 SIG 2 Perspectives on Neurophysiology and Neurogenic Speech and Language Disorders, October 2002, Vol. 12, 32. doi:10.1044/nnsld12.3.32 View Article Figures Tables PDF PDF Supplemental Data Supplements Multimedia Share Email Twitter Facebook Pinterest Tools Get Citation Citation Holland, A. (2002). Advocacy. Perspect Neurophysiol Neurogenic Speech Lang Disord, 12(3), 32. doi: 10.1044/nnsld12.3.32. Download citation file: RIS (Zotero) EndNote BibTex Medlars ProCite RefWorks Reference Manager © 2018 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association × Alerts User Alerts You are adding an alert for: Advocacy You will receive an email whenever this article is corrected, updated, or cited in the literature. You can manage this and all other alerts in My Account The alert will be sent to: Confirm × Sign In or Create a free account to receive alerts. × The June 2002 issue of the Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation features an article entitled, “Perspectives on the Rehabilitation of Individuals With Cognitive Impairments After Brain Injury: A Rationale for Reconsideration Of Theoretical Paradigms.” This article was written by Mark Ylvisaker, Robin Hanks, and Douglas Johnson-Greene, on behalf of the Joint Committee on Interprofessional Relations between Division 40 (Clinical Neuropsychology) of the American Psychological Association and ASHA. This cooperative work by one speech-language-pathologist (Ylvisaker) and two clinical neuropsychologists (Hanks and Johnson-Greene) presents a cogent and well-argued contrastive description of traditional approaches to TBI management and what the authors term a “contextualized” approach. A central distinction between them is the impairment centered focus for traditional treatment, while the contextualized approach emphasizes treatment focused on activities limitations and societal participation, to use the World Health Organization’s terms. Not only is this a particularly readable and important article, it is testament to the growing spirit of cooperation between the two professions. First Page Preview × View Large Subscribe to view more For full access to this article, log in to an existing user account, become a SIG affiliate, or purchase a short-term subscription. Become a SIG Affiliate Join a SIG Pay Per View Entire SIG 2 Perspectives on Neurophysiology and Neurogenic Speech and Language Disorders content & archive 24-hour access $25.00 Buy Now This Issue 24-hour access $17.00 Buy Now This Article 24-hour access $10.00 Buy Now Sign In or Create an Account Please sign in using your ASHA.org login. If you do not have an ASHA login, you may register with us for free by creating a new account. Sign In or Create an Account We've Changed Our Publication Model... The 19 individual SIG Perspectives publications have been relaunched as the new, all-in-one Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups. Learn more > Related Articles Public Policy Agenda Sets Advocacy Priorities for 2018 The ASHA Leader, January 2018, Vol. 23, 62. doi:10.1044/leader.AN1.23012018.62 Self-Advocacy Is the Answer to Medicaid Challenges The ASHA Leader, November 2017, Vol. 22, 4. doi:10.1044/leader.IN1.22112017.4 Raise Awareness on Student Virtual Advocacy Day The ASHA Leader, October 2017, Vol. 22, 61. doi:10.1044/leader.AN2.22102017.61 ‘Tolerance’ Is Not Enough The ASHA Leader, October 2017, Vol. 22, 4. doi:10.1044/leader.IN2.22102017.4 ‘Speechless’ Recognized for Social Change Advocacy The ASHA Leader, June 2017, Vol. 22, 10. doi:10.1044/leader.NIB2.22062017.10 Related Topics Regulatory, Legislative & Advocacy