CE Introduction For this issue of Perspectives, I asked five authors to write articles about some important issues that come up when reviewing the evidence in neurogenic speech-language pathology. In the first article, Elman warns us about several sources of bias that can affect the kinds of intervention that get endorsed ... SIG News
SIG News  |   April 01, 2007
CE Introduction
Author Notes
Article Information
SIG News
SIG News   |   April 01, 2007
CE Introduction
SIG 2 Perspectives on Neurophysiology and Neurogenic Speech and Language Disorders, April 2007, Vol. 17, 2. doi:10.1044/nnsld17.1.2
SIG 2 Perspectives on Neurophysiology and Neurogenic Speech and Language Disorders, April 2007, Vol. 17, 2. doi:10.1044/nnsld17.1.2
For this issue of Perspectives, I asked five authors to write articles about some important issues that come up when reviewing the evidence in neurogenic speech-language pathology. In the first article, Elman warns us about several sources of bias that can affect the kinds of intervention that get endorsed as practice guidelines. In the second article, Baylor and Yorkston provide a guide to using and evaluating published systematic reviews and practice recommendations. In the third article, Hopper validates the challenges faced by clinicians as they attempt to “keep up” with the research evidence and provides some practical solutions. Finally, Wambaugh encourages clinicians to be active participants by collecting “evidence” in clinical practice through “practice-based evidence.”
First Page Preview
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview ×
View Large
Become a SIG Affiliate
Pay Per View
Entire SIG 2 Perspectives on Neurophysiology and Neurogenic Speech and Language Disorders content & archive
24-hour access
This Issue
24-hour access
This Article
24-hour access
We've Changed Our Publication Model...
The 19 individual SIG Perspectives publications have been relaunched as the new, all-in-one Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups.